This line of speculative questioning by Eric Nelson is painting a picture for any jury member who might doubt that Chauvin intentionally murdered George Floyd. By consistently (and annoyingly) putting words in the mouths of witnesses and twisting the narrative, this could turn into an incident where a juror could ignorantly see the crowd as a threat, use drug usage as a foundation for Chauvin's response, justify nearly all forms of police brutality, and set the need for natural law back into a dark hole.

Only people mentioned by @CrownTheDefense in this post can reply

No replies yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Malikah Lese, click on at the bottom under it